Jump to content

peterharvey73

Regular Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • First Name*
    Peter

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Lexus Model*
    GS300
  • Year of Lexus*
    2010
  • Location*
    New South Wales
  • How did you find us?
    Google

peterharvey73's Achievements

Member

Member (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I tested a GS250. The engine is not the same as my IS250. The 2.5 has been tweaked, and has a lot more bottom end torque than both my IS250 and my GS300. Thus, to answer your question, does it have enough power to lug some 1.7 tons - the answer is a resounding yes! I was surprised myself. I originally thought the 2.5 would be quite sluggish. However, flat out, the GS250 still takes 8.6 seconds to do 0-100. Compared with a 1996-01 ES300 which takes 8.4 seconds. And a 2005-12 GS300 which takes 7.3 seconds. The top end of the GS250 is certainly a bit compromised, however you won't feel that around town. Thus, combined with an entry level take home price of $84k, I think this new GS range could sell in much greater volume...
  2. Hillcrest, my GS rattles like hell too. When I test drove several 2006 and 2008 Lexus GS300's, there seemed to be no creak or rattles at all. Somehow, mine has a creak in the central console, and a rattle inside the glove box. There was also a creak in the sun roof. The creak in the sunroof got worse as the car got dirtier. When I took it back to Lexus, they apparently cleaned the rubber around the sunroof, and the creak went away. Not so, the central console and glovebox rattle. I also have an IS250. The IS250's dash is rock solid. More interestingly, the IS250 feels to have a significantly more rigid body structure. Not so the long wheelbase GS300. It's long wheelbase flexes. And I suspect it is this flexing that causes the dashboard creaks and rattles. Thus, I just accept it. I drive with the sunroof open, or the passenger's window open mostly anyway. When all is closed, there is some creaking of the central console. I make sure I only put 235 kPa into the tyres. The recommended is 230 kPa. I once put 240 kPa into the tyres, and not only is the ride unpleasant, but even more creaks and rattles. I just accept it now. Not a purfect car. However, I am still quite happy with it. I have tried the new GS. You must try it. Definitely no creaks or rattles in the new GS; even in the early builds...
  3. I tested one last week. Here are the strengths and weaknesses. Strengths: The new spindle front end is good. The boot is a little larger than before, but no match for a capacious front drive Camry! The interior has higher seats, and there is a little more head room; no match for a Camry or Commodore though. At idle, the insulation is even more impressive than the outgoing model. Also, cruising along, the new model is even more isolated than it's predecessor. The power steering is now actually lighter, yet more feel. It is a little sharper than before. The ride has improved substantially. The old GS was a little too soft on the springs, too soft on the dampers resulting in floatiness, and too short in travel, always bottoming out. The new GS has such long travel, like a Commodore etc. The new GS is a fraction firmer in the springs for greater steering sharpness. It is also slightly better damped for less floatiness. However, the travel is really long now, giving an impressively comfortable ride. The body structure is also more rigid than before, with no squeaks and rattles in around the glove box and the central console like the old model. The handling is better, but not a great deal; the 5 Series is still firmer on the springs and sharper than the GS. The current model IS250 would simply leave the new GS behind for dead on a handling circuit. The new GS 2.5L V6 is not actually an IS250 engine. Now it has bags of bottom end torque! The new GS has an impressively improved equipment list including: Fully electric boot closing. Much more adjustments for driver's seat. Fully automatic parking brake, synchronised with the "P" setting on the auto tranny. Significantly more powerful, more effortless, and cleaner hi-fi system. Blind spot and lane change warning lights. Clearer sat nav display. Auto dipping hi beam. Headup display. Rear window sunshades. Rear adjustment for fore/aft of front passenger seat, to improve rear chauffer driven passenger legroom. Rear adjustment of temperature, fanspeed, and stereo system. Overall, the greatest advancement of the new GS is the longer suspension travel benefiting the ride a great deal!!! There is also a little more room, more bottom end torque, lighter steering with more feel and more sharpness, and heaps of equipment. The GS now has the very best engine, ride and refinement in it's class. Weaknesses: However, the brake cooling intakes and the foglights are bland. The C pillar area is bland; the old GS C pillar treatment, or the C pillar treatment on the LS would be much better. The new GS tail is very bland, some likening it to a Hyundai Sonata; the tail is no match for the prototype which it is based on. Constructively, the GS tail end styling should have taken off the LS, or at least the IS, or even a refinement of the old GS tail end styling! The interior styling is complex, untidy, boring, designed for the older person aka 60+, and will age very quickly; Benz and Beamer have GS beaten solidly here! The interior only has a little more headroom, not a great deal, and certainly no match for an E Class or 5 Series. Disappointingly, the rear foot room is only a little bigger than before; just a touch roomier - very disappointing. The rear leg room, and the rear hip room seems to have actually diminished! Although the new 2.5 V6 has bags of bottom end torque, it is moderately louder, and not as smooth. There is no longer a 6 stack disc player; rather it uses a single disc player, and relies on you to play music via your own compressed mp3 music player. The greatest drawback of the new 2012 GS lies in the poor styling, outside and inside! Then there's the louder engines, something that is not Lexus-like, but bearable. Conclusion Overall, the new GS is a mixed bag compared with the old model. In comes the superb stiffer platform and super duper ride, with lighter power steering with more feel, and greater sharpness, and a brilliant stereo. Out goes the slick, and timeless styling, and the insulated engines. Where the old GS had style with fair mechanicals. The new GS has sound mechanicals, with fair styling. Take your pick. Pity it couldn't combine both together. The E Class and the 5 Series will continue to romp away with sales. The main advantage of the E Class and 5 Series over the new GS is two fold: (1) new GS poor styling inside and out, and (2) GS's slightly smaller interior. If the new GS had retained the old GS's quietness under acceleration, then that would be a big boon to the new GS. However, this new GS esp with it's $84k entry price, should be able to solidly kill and outsell the Audi A6 and the Jag XF this time around. Btw, the unconventional styling of the soon to be release Infiniti M37 coming Down Under, has no hope of competing against the new Lexus GS...
  4. Welcome to the Lexus forums peterharvey73 :)

×
×
  • Create New...




Forums


News


Membership